FOR MATTHEW AND LUKE TO WITNESS JESUS AS A BABY MAKES YOU SAY HMMM
The Civil Writer Magazine
So the shepherds went to Bethlehem and found Mary and Joseph. The baby Jesus was lying in a manger as they had been told. When they saw him, they told everyone what the angel had said and everyone who heard the story were astonished. The nativity scene of Jesus or birth of Jesus is described in the gospels of Matthew and Luke. Matthew 1:18 (KJV) 18 Now the birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise: When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Ghost. Luke 2:10-11 (KJV) 10 And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people. 11 For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord. A Jewish tax collector, and a gentile physician wrote some of the most famous books in history called Matthew and Luke. But this presents a question, how did they both know about Jesus's birth when they were not there? According to the Gospel of Matthew Jesus met Matthew collecting taxes: "As Jesus went on from there, he saw a man named Matthew sitting at the tax collector's booth. "Follow me", he told him, and Matthew got up and followed him." The physician Luke never met Jesus at all. When you read the accounts of Jesus's birth as written by Matthew and Luke they make you say Hmmm being they were never there to witness the event. How could they write about an event when neither were present to witness. They had no Empirical evidence that is information received by means of the senses, particularly by observation by being there in the flesh in the manger. Even if it was handed-down information by angels it would be approximately 70 years before it surfaced from the pens of Matthew, and Luke who never met Jesus, Mary or Joseph to transcribe the event as it actually took place.