PROVE ME WRONG FOR $50 TO A CHARITY OF YOUR CHOICE THE NAME JESUS DOESN'T SEND ANYBODY RUNNING
HOW SWEET IS THE NAME JESUS THAT'S NO DIFFERENT THAN THE NAME HOSEA
The name Jesus (European 1524 CE) is a generic name used for psychological means rather than medical means. It was a statement to Europeans that your God is white with a white name. Also the prophet "Oseas" name was converted to Spanish i.e., the prophet Hosea. In the Hebrew Bible, Hosea, son of Beeri, was an 8th-century BC prophet in Israel who authored the book of prophecies bearing his name. The name Iēsous is an older Greek name that was corrupted by English “scholars to create a new European name of Jesus. If you conclude that there is power in the name Jesus, you have to conclude there is also power in his white image because both were added at the same time, 1495–1498, 1524.
I know the Symantecs about the letter J is actually the letter “I”. So it was Written as IESUS. Then some time latter the Letter I was written as J to give it an stylish touch. During this period of time the name Iēsous was converted to be a Spanish white name along with the disciples European white names. The name Jesus is not biblical it absent in Hebrew, Latin and Greek it is a Spanish (white) name added in the 1500s and printed into the revised Bibles. The name Jesus has been psychologically perpetrated to mean power upon its addition to the Bibles in 1500s. What powers did the Christians use previous to the name. So why upon its inception does it became more powerful than Santiago, Sebastian, Sophia, and Isabella? Because they attached it to their God therefore through association it became powerful.